Every time your company needs to replace an employee, it incurs recruitment, interviewing, administrative, onboarding, and training costs.
Even in the simplest of cases, where you do not use recruitment firms and find the right replacement immediately, someone in your HR department spends time searching, screening CVs, interviewing, getting paperwork going, preparing for the employee’s arrival (desk, computer, logins, provisioning etc), showing him/her around, and training him/her on corporate procedures and policies. Several departments are likely involved in this process, including HR, business function, legal, and IT.
Once the administrative part is done, the new employee still needs to get trained on his/her job, which requires time from other people on the team. His/her colleagues not only train him/her but carry the additional workload during the time it takes the recruit to become fully operational.
It is generally estimated that the full cost of one employee replacement varies between 50% and 150% of his/her annual payroll, depending on the seniority level.
While turnover rates depend on industries and geographies, these rates increased sharply in all developed economies in recent years following economic growth and strengthening job markets. For example, in the United States turnover rates across industries grew to 15.7% in 2014 (16.4% in 2015) after being around 9% in previous crisis years.
The turnover cost applies regardless of how the previous employee left (e.g., whether you fired the employee or he/she decided to leave), but it is usually higher per employee in cases of voluntary turnovers because you have no time to plan for them and they generally involve the most valuable elements of your workforce. So what can you do to fight voluntary turnover?
All studies concur that the most important criteria of job satisfaction relate to compensation, financial benefits, and job security, with 60% of employees finding those very important. If you have the means to double the average job salary in your field, you can likely get your turnover close to zero. However, most companies cannot afford to do that, so they settle for aligning their policies to the job market, which basically equates you with everybody else.
The question is what you can do for your employees that will not cost much but will make a difference. It turns out that employee satisfaction is influenced by many factors other than compensation, such as the following:
A modern collaborative Intranet, such as eXo, helps with a number of employee satisfaction factors in all categories:
Generally speaking, an Intranet presents the company’s image and voice to employees, and it can nurture trust in the company’s future, growth, and relevance in today’s digital world.
An efficient collaborative Intranet usually translates into at least a 30% increase in employee satisfaction, all other factors being equal. In turn, this translates into a 20% improvement in turnover rates. The exact cash value of this improvement depends on your company metrics. Below is one real-life example from our practice.
The average cost of replacing an employee was estimated at 53% of the annual employee cost. An improvement of the voluntary turnover by 0.72% lead to an actual cost savings of $170K each year in recruitment costs.
A modern employee-centered Intranet helps reduce turnover, but turnover will, of course, still exist. Some employees have to leave (e.g., retirement, medical leave), and others are asked to leave. Even if you are considered the best place to work in your industry, you will still face constant replacement needs and the associated costs of recruiting, onboarding, and training.
You can estimate the value of a better, more-efficient onboarding process through time gains. In our experience, no matter what your current onboarding process looks like, it can be cut by at least 30% through Intranet use. Estimate the time cost of the different people involved in onboarding, and you will see the immediate cash benefits from implementing a user-centric Intranet introduction. The best part is that the above benefits are not linked to adoption, and they can be fully reaped as soon as your Intranet goes in production.
Let’s go back to our previous example. The onboarding time was estimated at 124 hours per employee, including the time other employees spent to receive, onboard, provision, and train an average employee. Reducing this time by 30% amounted to $60K in annual savings.
Of course, you can estimate the value a modern Intranet has on your turnover and onboarding process by taking some internal measurements and making some assumptions.
You already have your total employee count, yearly turnover rate (including voluntary and nonvoluntary), and average employee cost. Those KPIs are available from the HR department and the finance department.
If you do not measure and follow the cost of replacing an employee, you can estimate it by mapping your recruiting, onboarding, and training process for a junior position and a senior position. Determine which people are involved at each step internally, how much time it takes them to participate in the process, and what that time costs the company.
This will give you an average employee replacement cost (expressed as a percentage of salary) and an average onboarding cost for your company. Alternatively, you can use the lowest benchmark for employee replacement cost (50%) and the average hourly length of the onboarding process as your ballpark estimate.
Once you have your costs, make some assumptions about the adoption rate and turnover rate improvement. Our average benchmark shows a 60% adoption rate in year three for eXo solutions, an average 20% improvement on voluntary turnover, and a minimum 30% decrease in onboarding time.
For example, assuming you have an 800-employee company with a 7% voluntary turnover rate, with the other metrics based on benchmarks, you can expect a $200K cash value from turnover improvement in year three and a $60K savings on onboarding costs.
As a final note, I personally love math. However, most of the people I know do not share this feeling. I hope the above explanations were clear, not too boring, and, above all, useful. In the next post in this series, we will explore the cash benefits of improved internal communications.